A third version of Budget Ordinance #706 was shown to the Town of Jonesboro’s Board of Aldermen at last Friday’s special called meeting, only to be tabled because additional changes needed to be made, according to the town’s controversial mayor Leslie Thompson.
The latest revision lists revenues and expenses of about $3.77 million, compared to what was introduced last November (about $3.42 million), and an earlier revision revealed in December that showed the number at about $3.44 million.
See here the documents:
#706 – latest revision
#706 – first revision
#706 – original
Budget spreadsheet – latest revision
Budget spreadsheet – first revision
Multiple versions of budget ordinances for which public hearings had not been held is the subject of an ongoing lawsuit, Essmeier v Jonesboro. The town lost the suit last August in a ruling by Second Judicial (Bienville, Claiborne, Jackson parishes) District Court Division B Judge Jimmy Teat.
That ruling was appealed by the defendants to Louisiana’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and is awaiting resolution.
Meanwhile, it appears that the town’s budget amending process still does not meet the Local Government Budget Act’s mandate.
Serious Revenue Shortfall Now Evident
Another problem was revealed in other documents presented to the board – a serious revenue shortfall compared to what was originally budgeted.
Halfway through the 2011-2012 fiscal year, revenues from sales and use taxes from the first six months are at about $262 thousand (31%) of the $850 thousand that is budgeted to be collected. The number should be close to half of the budget, or about $425 thousand.
See here the document.
A similar situation exists in the street and water fund, where revenues are at about 31% halfway through the fiscal year.
See here the document.
Other revenue line items that are below budget are licenses, other/miscellaneous, garbage fees, and fines/forfeitures.
Total operating revenues so far this fiscal year – excluding grants – are about $600 thousand compared to operating expenditures of about $800 thousand.
Taxpayers will need to watch for attempts to “borrow” state and federal grant monies, and use those funds for town operations. Grants are specifically dedicated to projects and by law must be used for those specific purposes.
Legal Services Agreement
Also discussed at Friday’s meeting was the legal services agreement between the town and Second Judicial (Bienville, Claiborne, Jackson parishes) Assistant District Attorney Douglas Stokes, the town’s legal adviser.
District B’s Renee Stringer inquired as to whether an individual board member could ask the town attorney questions, or would they have to submit them first to the mayor in writing.
Asked Stringer, “If this council has a question, we have to pose it to the mayor, and then he presents it to you – is that how it works?”
Stokes replied that indeed that was the case.
“You ask the mayor to ask an opinion from me – in writing – and I respond – in writing,” Stokes said.
See here the document.