Last night’s meeting of the Town of Jonesboro’s Board of Aldermen heard a litany of complaints from some on the board about the fiscal administrator law, under which the town has been operating since last September. Jonesboro CPA Kenneth Folden was appointed as fiscal administrator at that time.
In 2012, a fiscal administrator (William Ryder) was appointed, but he resigned in frustration after several months on the job, citing non-cooperation by the town’s former mayor Leslie Thompson. The controversy over Ryder’s term as FA sparked the Louisiana Legislature to strengthen the law in 2013. The new provisions give the FA almost unlimited power to run the town, subject to court supervision.
Among the complaints that were voiced:
Charla Mason-Melton (District C) – “You’re (City Attorney Doug Stokes) making it seem like the fiscal administrator has all these powers, but in fact the BOARD has all these powers.”
Mason-Melton also said that Folden hasn’t been keeping the board informed, and that he’d been paid nearly $100 thousand since he came on board.
LaStevic Cottonham (Alderman-at-Large) – “This man’s (Folden) got the last say. Regardless of what the Constitution says, the Lawrason Act, regardless of what they say in Baton Rouge – in Jonesboro that’s the man. Is it legal? Is it right? Do we have to abide by it?”
“What we need to do is see if we can get the Attorney General, or somebody to come up when we have our meetings. Let them sit there and tell us it ain’t going like that.”
Devin Flowers (District D and Mayor Pro Tem) – “We’re the elected body, and when we want stuff done, we shouldn’t have to come to you (Folden). We should be able to to come straight to Doug (Stokes).”
The board members mused the possibility of hiring another city attorney, but realized that unless the FA approved, he wouldn’t be paid.
Sam Lamkin (District A) noted that other towns in North Louisiana (Richwood and Gibsland) have fiscal administrators, and that they have the last say in those towns.
Said Stokes, “The fiscal administrator’s power is the same as if you’re talking about the mayor’s power.” He added, “I’ve given you my opinion, and again I’ve often given advice that people don’t like. You can follow it or not follow it.”
Stokes noted that Folden reports to the court, and not the board. He also noted the history of how the present law came to be.
“The fiscal administrator assigns and reassigns duties for all city employees. That’s his power. You (the board) act only in an advisory capacity.”
District B’s Renee Stringer asked Folden if he had an exit strategy. She said that the new law gave the FA too much power.
Said Stringer, “I’ve made the statement early on, and I’ve even made the statement to Mr. Folden personally, this fiscal administrator law is too far reaching. It tramples on the Constitution and it tramples on the Lawrason Act.”
Stokes said that the latest expression of the legislative will controls.
The board attempted to resolve an issue regarding the minutes of March 26, and April 8, which have apparently not been transcribed. According to Stringer, several items weren’t included that should have been. Stokes said the council could make amendments as needed, and then approve them.
Mason-Melton asked Folden about a budget for the upcoming year, to which Folden replied he would present it at the next meeting.
There was also discussion about requesting an attorney general’s opinion on the conflicting laws.
Stokes noted that an AG opinion is advisory only, and not legally binding.
We will have more reporting later.