Archive for December, 2010
There’s more caterwauling from Monroe City Council Chairman Jay Marx today about the water meter issue.
The city has been in discussions since the early to mid 1990s about the best way to replace the existing system and the aging water meters. City officials said some of the meters are not registering the correct amount of water while other meters are not registering at all.
Has anyone said why no effort has been made to replace the meters that are not registering with something, anything that will record usage? Surely the city’s public works department has access to replacement meters of the style now in use.
Anyone at city hall care to answer that question?
The Monroe City Council tonight failed to adopt an ordinance that would have approved the hiring of Vanguard Utility Service to install an automatic meter reading (AMR) system for the city’s water distribution complex.
The motion failed on a 2-2 vote, with Jay Marx and Gretchen Ezernack voting yea and Arthur Gilmore and Eddie Clark voting nay.
Earlier, Gilmore had tried to amend the ordinance to select Triton AMI as the contractor. Triton’s price was some $100 thousand less than that of of Vanguard.
That motion also failed 2-2 with Gilmore and Clark voting yea.
The ordinance will be reconsidered at a special call meeting of the council at noon Thursday.
Today’s editorial in The (Monroe) News-Star is one of the reasons we do what we do.
Governmental activist Byrd Minter also has raised so many questions about water metering and devoted so much time to studying the system over the years that both newspaper reporters and council members almost hate to see him coming.
In other words, taxpaying citizens who want answers from the government they pay for are malcontents who should just shut up and pay their taxes. The decisions on where and how taxpayer money should be spent are to be left to the public’s betters.
This comes from a newspaper who’s executive editor has a husband on the government payroll at ULM.
We know Byrd Minter – Byrd Minter is a friend of ours and he’s not afraid to confront out-of-control government and ask questions.
In all the coverage the News-Star claims to have done on this issue, has anyone at the newspaper ever asked the simple question of how much citizen’s water bills will increase? City Hall “reporter” Stacy Temple sure hasn’t.
So we here at Lincoln Parish News Online (LPNO) will continue to ask the hard questions, dig up the campaign finance records, look at the laws – all the stuff the newspapers won’t do because they’re in bed with government.
Our friend Moon Griffon long ago tagged Gannett’s Capital Bureau reporter Mike Hasten as “Deputy Press Secretary for Government.”
With all the commotion surrounding the City of Monroe and its dysfunctional government, its not a bit too early to check out the campaign finance reports for Mayor Jamie Mayo. There’s an election coming up in early 2012 and campaign finance reports are often the best predictor of how/why things happen when it comes to doing business with government.
See here 2009 contributions
See here 2008 contributions
The first one that jumped out at us was $2,500 from Camp Dresser McKee (CDM), a consulting engineering firm who has done business with Monroe for years.
Here are a few others who have done business with the City of Monroe
The next round of annual financial reports should be coming out sometime in February, covering the year 2010.
This will be change order number 12. We’ve not kept an exact running total of the adders to this project, but this has to put the total near 10% of the original $32 million project amount.
Here is the agenda.
Also to be considered is the water system’s Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) project. Likely it will pass, but if you ask anyone at City Hall how much or if the water bill will increase, they won’t tell you.
Which IS an answer – and you all know what it is.
One of Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s more bizarre plans to raise money to help meet Louisiana’s deadhead payroll is to sell off taxpayer assets for immediate cash.
State Treasurer John Kennedy had it pegged from the get-go.
“A junkie can go sell his television and sell the radio and pay for a fix,” Kennedy said. “But sooner or later … he’s got to face his addiction. I would prefer to have us face our addiction.”
It seems Jindal isn’t the only governor that thinks selling taxpayer assets is a good idea. See today’s The New York Times.
As Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger prepares to decamp from Sacramento on Jan. 3, he has displayed zealous determination to complete what critics say will be among the worst deals the state has ever made: the sale of 11 premier state office complexes to a group of politically connected private investors.
The deal, which includes the San Francisco Civic Center, has been pitched as a way to generate much-needed cash. California would pocket about $1.3 billion after debt is paid off, but would then be a tenant in the same buildings. According to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office, the deal would cost taxpayers $6 billion over 35 years.