Auditor Warns Again on School Board Retirement Shortfall

A year after warning the Lincoln Parish School Board (LPSB) that it wasn’t funding employee retirement and health care programs sufficiently, Allen, Green & Williamson’s Amy Tynes was back again this year with similar warnings.

Tyne presented the annual audit at yesterday’s meeting of the board at Glen View Elementary.

Said Tynes, “The total liabilities were $208 million. And you’ll notice if you compare this to last year, its around an $89 million increase. The past several years, we’ve had to record a liability on the books for that health care part of that promise. This year, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board came back and said we want to see what the dollar amount for the pension part that you’re promising your individuals, and that hit full force this year.”

She added, “For 2015, $54.8 million, that is how much on the books for your health care portion.”

Tynes said that the problem wasn’t isolated to Lincoln Parish, and that all the school districts in the state were not funding the programs nearly enough.

As far as daily operations, the Lincoln District audit had no findings, and showed the system to be in good financial shape.

In other reports, Business Manager Georg Murphy reported that the January Sales Tax collections are still greater than last year’s.

However, we noticed the increases are beginning to slow down, likely a result of the slowdown in the oil & gas activity in the area.

Murphy also said that the year was “horrible” for the health care insurance fund, but that recent increases in the deductible and copay rates hopefully would stem the red ink.


2 Responses to “Auditor Warns Again on School Board Retirement Shortfall”

  1. Ruh-Roh Says:

    So the School Board is accumulating debt in the form of future liability for retirement and health insurance for retirees, at a rate of (89-54.8) $34,200,000.00 increase per year, is this accurate?
    What is the plan to deal with this?
    How can the School Board afford to disburse unexpected income as extra paychecks to teachers and support staff, while ignoring this debt and failing to put money back to cover it? Is that responsible management?

  2. Oldman Says:

    Maybe the teachers need to put a little more into their retirement fund instead of the taxpayers paying more. Or maybe more cuts to take care of the shortage,the way we the taxpayer has to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: