Teacher’s Retirement Fund Debt to be Studied

BESE panel approves teacher retirement study

by Will Sentell
wsentell@theadvocate.com

Despite protests from teacher unions and others, a committee of Louisiana’s top school board Tuesday approved a contract of nearly $143,000 for LSU to study the state’s nearly $12 billion teachers’ retirement debt.

The yearlong study is supposed to be overseen by Jim Richardson, director of the Public Administration Institute at LSU and a member of the influential Revenue Estimating Conference, which oversees Louisiana’s budget outlook.

The review is supposed to aid a task force of education groups grappling with the issue, including why costs continue to rise.

“It would be irresponsible for us to not have a third party take a look at the situation,” said Chas Roemer, president of the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Roemer, of Baton Rouge, said similar retirement problems have driven some municipalities into bankruptcy.

But officials of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, Louisiana Association of Educators and Louisiana School Boards Association opposed the contract.

At issue is what is called the Unfunded Accrued Liability, which is the money needed to pay promised benefits to both current and retired members.

The nearly $12 billion UAL for teachers is the largest of the state’s four retirement systems.

LSU will also provide updates every six weeks to the task force of education organizations studying retirement costs.

The study is supposed to uncover reasons for rising retirement expenses, the ability of local schools boards to handle the costs and the long-term sustainability of the system.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Teacher’s Retirement Fund Debt to be Studied”

  1. The Oncologist Says:

    better get a handle on it now; stop promising to pay something which at some time in the future, can no longer be paid.

  2. skipperT Says:

    Retirement funds usually fail and are bailed out by the taxpayer. This is wrong.

  3. bobradarbob Says:

    Didn’t the fund bail out the taxpayer in this instance?? Did the Gov. pull out of this plan somewhere in the neighborhood of $500 mil.? It’s entirely possible I have this all wrong but I’m sure I’ll be set straight….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: