What bothers me is the “strict scrutiny” judicial review clause that will be added to the constitution. As some pointed out the judicial review board/committee can change their minds and can allow or disallow as they choose.

This will put more power in the hands of the judicial arm of government when what we need is less government in our lives. And a concern of mine is: are the ones who would exercise the “strict scrutiny” appointed or elected? In other words could we vote them out if they didn’t exercise their “scrutiny” according to the wishes of the people? The judicial body does not always act in accordance with the people’s wishes. Haven’t we been seeing this for a while now , locally? My vote would be “NO” on Amendment 2. Louisiana has good gun laws now, in my opinion, so why change, especially not knowing the full ramifications of another law?